Here’s on Supreme Court’s Bold Step: Women as Better Custodians
In a landmark ruling and verdict, India’s Supreme Court has ruled that women prove to be better guardians in the best interest of custody wars. The verdict is rewriting what’s understood about custody wars—more emphasis on emotional and psychological safety over bare legal rights.
The Court’s Stand: Accord More Importance to Emotional Protection
The state’s highest court held that experience of care by a mother at an early, impressionable age is determinative. The court believed by convention and by nature, women do the caring, emotional security, and ritual—ingredients so essential to healthy development in childhood.
Shifting the Lens: From Patriarchy to Child-Centric Thinking
This ruling is more than custody—it makes patriarchal assumptions about Indian family law. Men have traditionally been granted custody or management on the basis of economic capability, but the court has moved now to what matters most: the mental and emotional welfare of the child.
Empowering Mothers: Legal and Social Recognition
To single mothers and women ensnared in child custody disputes, the shift is a tsunami of empowerment and validation. Not just legally an affirmation, it’s long overdue in legitimizing the unseen day-to-day work that women do.
Experts Welcome the Move
Scholar opinion and child welfare groups welcomed the decision as a move in the direction of gender-sensitive law. It puts care in its rightful place as an extremely useful, important part of parenthood—not to be debased or belittled.
Conclusion: In the quest for justice and equity, India is given an injection of thinking forward in the form of the Supreme Court ruling. It is a message that authentic justice craves for the child welfare, concern, and compassion—and not just tradition.
Add comment